• Statuses And Portents

    • Look, I don't care what zoo you're at, it's basically 80% weird deer. 1 week ago
    • This early ST:TNG casting memo, courtesy @warrenellis, is making my brain explode with alternate-universe possibilities. 1 week ago
    • Satoshi Kon died? In tribute, picture my animated sadface, melting into something mildly disturbing but profound. 1 week ago
    • @taopauly : pure genius if you take off the onions and/or peppers, or else get onions that have been properly caramelized 'stead of sweated. 1 week ago
    • On a related note, must buy 1. bubble wrap 2. razors 3. band-aids 4. stock in tetanus vaccine manufacturers 2 weeks ago
    • More updates...

    Posting tweet...

  • Information

  • Absinthe On Matters Strategical

  • Archives

  • Meta

  • License

  • « | Home | »

    02.13.07

    Winning Pots Is Not The Object Of Poker

    posted by Absinthe | 7:00 PM

    ….but it, let’s say, helps.
    Won one pot. Out at the first break. Nice structure in these – T2500 to start, 25-25 blinds, one hour levels – pity I couldn’t take advantage of it.
    Card-deadness continues. For the two hours of play I got, I got no pairs, one big ace (AJ s00ted in EP), one suited connector (QJ UTG), one otherwise pretty hand (KJ s00ted), and that’s it.
    How did I go from 2500 to zero in two levels, anyway? Good question., considering I’d still have plenty of chips if I just took a nap for the first two hours. I made a good flop raise against someone with a medium pair (that was good) but the turn card killed the hand I was representing; I think otherwise I’d have been able to take it. Unfortunately I stabbed at the turn anyway and it was a moderately expensive stab.
    Down to a little over 1k, I got a cheap look from the SB with QJo, flopped top two on a QJ9 board, checkraised the button all-in (a substantial overbet), he called with TT and missed. Hey, chips!
    Yeah, that was the pot I won.
    Lost about 20% of my stack to a raggedy straight on the river, then lost the rest against an aggressive, big-stacked table captain who turned the nut straight against my second nuts. I missed the three-outer for the chop and that was it. Not my day.

    Popularity: 1% [?]

    Topics: Poker | 1 Comment »

    One Response to “Winning Pots Is Not The Object Of Poker”

    1. smokkee Says:
      February 14, 2007 at 9:05 PM

      i feel your pain Ryan. i’m not running well at all right now. hang in there.

    Comments